Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼ø, ±¸°³¿­ ȯÀÚ¿Í Á¤»ó ¼Ò¾ÆÀÇ µÎ°³¾È¸é ÇüÅ¿¡ °üÇÑ ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸

A Comparative Study Of Craniofacial Morphology Of Cleft Lip Children With Or Without Palate

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1995³â 25±Ç 2È£ p.459 ~ 470
Á¶¼ö¹ü, ±è¿µÁÖ, ±èº´Á÷,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¶¼ö¹ü (  ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
±è¿µÁÖ (  ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
±èº´Á÷ (  ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ

Abstract

1988³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 1995³â 12¿ù±îÁö ¼ø, ±¸°³¿­À» ÁÖ¼Ò·Î ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø¿¡ ³»¿øÇÑ È¯
ÀÚ 40¸í(9.4¡¾2.8¼¼)°ú ¾È¸ðÀÇ ÇüÅ°¡ AnlgeºÐ·ù¹ý Class ¥°¿¡ ÇØ´çµÇ°í °¡°è¿¡ º´·ÂÀÌ ¾ø´Â
Á¤»ó ¼Ò¾Æ 40¸í À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÃøµÎ±Ô°Ý ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀ» ÃÔ¿µÇÏ°í ÃøµÎ±Ô°Ý¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø»ó¿¡¼­ µÎ
°³¾È¸é ÇüŸ¦ ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. µÎ°³±âÀúºÎ(cranial base)¿¡¼­´Â ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­ Èĵΰ³±âÀúÀÇ ±Ù¿ø½É°æ
(S-Ba)°ú Àüü µÎ°³±âÀúÀÇ ±Ù¿ø½É°æ(N-Ba)ÀÌ ´õ ª¾Ò´Ù(P<0.05).
2. »ó¾È¸éºÎ(upper face)¿¡¼­´Â ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­ Àü»ó¾È¸éÀÇ °í°æ(N-ANS)¿Í
»ó¾Ç ÈÄ¿¬ÀÇ °í°æ(Ptm'-SNL)ÀÌ ´õ ª¾Ò´Ù(P<0.05).
3. ÇϾȸéºÎ(lower face)¿¡¼­´Â ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­ ÇϾǰñÀÇ ±Ù¿ø½É°æ(Pog-Ar)
°ú ÇÏ¾Ç °ñüÀÇ ±Ù¿ø½É°æ(Pog-Go)ÀÌ Âª¾Æ ÇϾÇÀÌ ÈÄÅðµÇ´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù(P<0.05).
4. »ó, ÇϾÇÀÇ °ü°è´Â ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­ Àü¾È¸éÀÇ °í°æ(N-Me)°ú ÈľȸéÀÇ °í
°æ(S-Go)ÀÌ Âª¾Ò´Ù(P<0.05).
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to determine whether any difference existed in
craniofacial morphology between cleft children and normal subjects.
Thirty three measurements of the various regions of cranium and face were obtained
from lateral cephalometric radiograms in 40 cleft children(27 males, 13 females) and 40
normal subjects(23 males, 17 females) in our dental hospital from Jan. 1988 to Dec. 1995.
The measurements were compared with those in control subjects who had no history
of craniofacial abnormalities.
The obtained results were as follows:
1. In the cranium, the cleft children had significantly shorter posterior cranial base
length(5-l3a) and total antero-posterior cranial base length(N-Ba) (P<0.05).
2. In the upper face, the cleft children had significantly shorter upper anterior facial
height(N-ANS) and upper posterior facial height(Ptm'-SNL) (P<0.05)
3. In The tower face, the cleft children had significantly shorter antero-posterior
mandibular length(log-Ar) and antero-posterior mandibular body length(Pog-Go)
(P<0.05).
4. In the facial profile, the cleft children had significantly shorter total facial
height(N-Me) and posterior facial height(5-Go) (P<0.05).

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸